Posted Thursday, June 28, 2018 by Pivotal Law Group
Great Danes might be the best dogs - they're calm, require relatively little exercise and space, and are super affectionate towards their human family. Unlike a lot of needier breeds who need constant activity, Danes reputedly just want to chill with you…
Posted Wednesday, June 20, 2018 by Pivotal Law Group
More than ever, technology is fundamental to our lives. In 2018, even hardened luddites maintain email, social media, and/or cloud-storage accounts, or store considerable information on their smartphones. Maintaining digital information electronically…
Posted Thursday, June 14, 2018 by Pivotal Law Group
Among the challenges of a mental health condition is the difficulty persuading health insurers to cover treatment. Mental health conditions can be difficult to objectively diagnose and can require lengthy and expensive treatment often with little…
Posted Tuesday, June 12, 2018 by Pivotal Law Group
How Long Do I Have To Dispute An Insurance Claim?* If your insurer denies your claim or takes some action with which you disagree, how long do you have to dispute the insurer’s decision? For example, if your health insurer refuses to authorize surgery…
Posted Tuesday, June 12, 2018 by Pivotal Law Group
On June 7, 2018, the Washington Supreme Court, in Durant v. State Farm, ruled insurers may not limit payments to policyholders under auto insurance Personal Injury Protection (“PIP”) to only treatment needed for the insured to reach “maximum medical…
Posted Tuesday, May 22, 2018 by Pivotal Law Group
Shannon Leahy found herself in a common situation when dealing with her auto insurer following a car crash. Her insurer agreed she was not at fault, but refused to pay her claim, arguing her medical treatment was unrelated to the crash. Ms. Leahy’s…
Posted Wednesday, May 16, 2018 by Christopher L. Thayer
In Lockner v. Pierce County (No. 94643-4, April 19, 2018), the Washington Supreme Court recently revisited Washington’s Recreational Use Immunity Act and clarified its application. RCW 4.24.210 provides protection for owners of recreational property…
Posted Wednesday, May 9, 2018 by Pivotal Law Group
Self-driving vehicles are already on roads in several cities and are predicted to become normal in the next few decades. How will your insurance cover you if you’re the operator of a self-driving car? If someone else’s self-driving car injures you or…
Posted Thursday, May 3, 2018 by Pivotal Law Group
The May edition of the King County Bar Association's Bar Bulletin features an artile by Pivotal attorney McKean Evans. McKean discusses the Washington Court of Appeals' recent decision expanding insurance bad faith claims against individual adjusters and…
Posted Wednesday, May 2, 2018 by Pivotal Law Group
In its April 23, 2018 decision in Williams v. Foremost Insurance Co., 2:17-CV-1113-RSM, 2018 WL 1907523 (W.D. Wash. Apr. 23, 2018), the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington analyzed and rejected a frequent argument insurers make in…
Posted Thursday, April 26, 2018 by Christopher L. Thayer
In Sluys v. City of Seattle et al**, No. 76131-5-1 (April 9, 2018), in an unpublished decision the Court of Appeals, Division 1, recently ruled the City of Seattle was potentially liable for injuries suffered by a pedestrian who slipped and fell on a…
Posted Tuesday, April 17, 2018 by Pivotal Law Group
The Ninth Circuit’s recent ruling in Elhouty v. Lincoln Benefit Life, Case No. 15-16740 (March 27, 2018) is notable for two reasons. It illustrates the pitfalls of certain life insurance policies that supposedly pay for themselves, and it clarifies the…
Posted Wednesday, April 11, 2018 by Pivotal Law Group
For insureds, ERISA (which governs most employer-sponsored insurance) has a serious downside. Insureds and plan participants who dispute the company’s denial of their claims for coverage or benefits must submit to ERISA’s administrative appeal process…
Posted Wednesday, April 4, 2018 by Pivotal Law Group
On March 26, 2018, the Court of Appeals (Division One) issued an important published ruling upholding claims against an individual insurance adjuster for insurance bad faith and violations of the Consumer Protection Act (Ch. 19.86 RCW). In Keodalah v…
Posted Friday, March 30, 2018 by Pivotal Law Group
This morning, attorney McKean Evans spoke regarding Washington’s newly-revised Uniform Power of Attorney Act at a Continuing Legal Education seminar hosted by the King County Bar Association…
Posted Thursday, March 29, 2018 by Kim Sandher
From GPSOLO, Vol. 35, No. 2, March/April 2018
Posted Wednesday, March 21, 2018 by Pivotal Law Group
Washington’s 2018 legislative session recently closed. The legislative session resulted in a number of important changes to Washington law. The Washington legislature enacted significant police reforms. Initiative 940 requires law enforcement officers…
Posted Wednesday, March 14, 2018 by Pivotal Law Group
With states increasingly legalizing recreational marijuana retail sales, one question is whether specific towns that prefer not to have marijuana sold at retail can prohibit marijuana stores from opening within their borders. The Court of Appeals’ March…
Posted Wednesday, March 7, 2018 by Pivotal Law Group
Court of Appeals decision emphasizes minimal notice requirement for renewal insurance policy changes. A common pitfall for insurance policyholders lies in the insurer’s renewal notice. Policyholders often set their policy premiums to pay and set the…
Posted Wednesday, February 28, 2018 by Pivotal Law Group
The Washington Court of Appeals, in an unpublished decision in Schmidt v. American Commerce Insurance Company, recently decided claims against an insurance company where the jury concluded the insured burned his own house down. Schmidt rebuilt his home…