Posted Wednesday, October 4, 2017 by Pivotal Law Group
On October 2, 2017, the U.S. Supreme Court heard argument in three consolidated cases that could significantly alter employment law nationwide. The three cases, Epic Systems Corp. v. Lewis, Ernst & Young LLP v. Morris, and National Labor Relations…
Posted Thursday, September 28, 2017 by Pivotal Law Group
In its September 25, 2017 published decision in Cuesta v. State, No. 75405-0-I, the Court of Appeals ruled an employee who was terminated for falsely marking aircraft components as inspected was ineligible for unemployment benefits. Jose Cuesta was…
Posted Thursday, September 21, 2017 by Pivotal Law Group
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals recently ruled in favor of an insured in a dispute over coverage under an ERISA-governed benefits plan. In Salyers v. MetLife, Case No 15-56371 (September 20, 2017), the court applied the federal common law of agency to…
Posted Wednesday, September 20, 2017 by Pivotal Law Group
The litigation of Domestic Violence Protection Orders are an important role that the Court plays. These are the most protective (non-criminal) orders that a person can obtain. These orders assists victims of domestic violence in breaking the cycle, and…
Posted Wednesday, September 13, 2017 by Pivotal Law Group
Three recent lawsuits show the federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) is taking a hard look at suspected pregnancy discrimination. Since late August, the EEOC has sued three employers claiming they discriminated against pregnant…
Posted Thursday, September 7, 2017 by Christopher L. Thayer
View CNN's article here: http://money.cnn.com/2017/09/07/technology/business/equifax-data-breach/index.html
Posted Wednesday, September 6, 2017 by Christopher L. Thayer
In Schoenfelder, et al v. Larson (No. 48885-0-II), the Court of Appeals Division II recently addressed a situation involving several neighbors and a private roadway. A group of neighbors used a private road for access to their properties. Although the…
Posted Wednesday, August 30, 2017 by Pivotal Law Group
In its recent published opinion in Elliott Bay Adjustment Co., Inc. v. Caren Dacumos, the Washington Supreme Court confirmed the right of a debtor to collect attorneys’ fees in defending a meritless debt collection action in small claims court (i.e., in…
Posted Wednesday, August 23, 2017 by Christopher L. Thayer
In its recent published opinion in Schroeder v. Haberthur, the Washington Court of Appeals, Division Three, held that growing and felling timber is not “farming” under the Deed of Trust Act (“DTA”), construing the DTA using definitions found in the…
Posted Thursday, August 17, 2017 by Christopher L. Thayer
If you received a robocall offering you a free cruise from 2009 to 2014, you may be entitled to a settlement up to $900. Click here for a full link to the article or see the link below…
Posted Wednesday, August 16, 2017 by Christopher L. Thayer
Case Law Update: Injuries from assault not an “accident” and not covered by insurance In a recent unpublished decision, the Washington Court of Appeals (Division 1) addressed whether injuries caused by an intentional assault would be covered under an…
Posted Tuesday, August 8, 2017 by Christopher L. Thayer
Seattle Legislation Update: The Seattle City Council is considering passing an ordinance which would prohibit landlords from screening prospective tenants based on criminal histories (except for registered sex offenders). The proposed ordinance will be…
Posted Tuesday, August 8, 2017 by Christopher L. Thayer
We are very pleased to announce that McKean J. Evans has joined Pivotal Law Group as an associate attorney. McKean has recently moved to Seattle from Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania with his fiancé, a native of the Pacific Northwest. He is excited about moving…
Posted Wednesday, August 2, 2017 by Christopher L. Thayer
Posted Wednesday, July 26, 2017 by Christopher L. Thayer
The Washington State Court of Appeals (Division I) recently found the owner of a law firm operating as a sole proprietorship liable for debts incurred by his predecessor Limited Liability Company in Columbia Bank v. Invicta Law Group and Mark Jordan…
Posted Friday, July 21, 2017 by Christopher L. Thayer
In a recent unpublished decision by the Court of Appeals (Division III), Ramm v. Farmers Insurance Company (No. 34542-4), the court addressed whether or not a person who falls partially out of a vehicle while parked and is injured is entitled to Personal…
Posted Thursday, July 6, 2017 by Pivotal Law Group
On Wednesday, Governor Jay Inslee signed into law a measure promising to cover workers' income when taking time off for the birth of a child. Washington will become the fifth state to offer such protections. Washington's new law, which takes effect in…
Posted Wednesday, June 28, 2017 by Christopher L. Thayer
In a recent case before Division II of the Washington Court of Appeals, Herring v. Pelayo (No. 48786-1-II), the court revisited the “boundary tree” doctrine established by the Happy Bunch, LLC v. Grandview case, 142 Wn. App. 81 (2007), and harmonize it…
Posted Wednesday, June 21, 2017 by Christopher L. Thayer
On Monday, the Seattle City Council voted unanimously to require that Seattle landlords give tenants voter registration information as part of an already required information packet on housing laws. Studies have shown that people on the move vote at…
Posted Wednesday, June 14, 2017 by Pivotal Law Group
The REAL ID Act, passed by Congress in 2005, set standards for the issuance of sources of identification, such as driver's licenses. Here's the latest update residents of Washington need to know. Washington's standard driver's license/identification card…